ArticleBMC public health2026
Why they do not move: An explainable machine learning analysis of physical activity barriers in obese adolescents and tool translation.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the well-documented benefits of physical activity, insufficient activity remains highly prevalent among adolescents with obesity. This study is the first to apply interpretable machine learning methods to identify the barriers, facilitators, and U-shaped determinants of physical activity in this population.
methodsWe analyzed data from 1,041 adolescents with obesity from the China Education Panel Survey. A range of personal, family, and school-level variables were incorporated to construct six machine learning models for predicting physical activity attainment. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method, a game-theoretic approach for explainable artificial intelligence, was used to identify key predictive factors and quantify their relative contributions.
resultsThe Random Forest model demonstrated the best performance, achieving an accuracy of 85.30% and an AUC of 0.720 on the test set. SHAP analysis revealed several key factors associated with physical activity. Positive facilitators included parents with an education level beyond high school (≥ 3.27 for mothers, ≥ 3.51 for fathers), higher school rankings (≥ 3.77), adequate school sports facilities (≥ 1.44), and a personal interest in sports. Negative barriers included excessive screen time (≥ 5.51 h) and school location in central urban areas (≥ 4.23). Notably, U-shaped relationships were identified for academic workload, sleep problems, and self-perceived appearance. Specifically, moderate levels of these factors were associated with lower physical activity, whereas both low and high extremes promoted activity.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that physical activity among adolescents with obesity is shaped by a complex interplay of individual, family, and school-level factors, with parental education emerging as the strongest predictor. The identification of specific risk thresholds (e.g., screen time ≥ 5.51 h) and U-shaped relationships offers precise, actionable targets for intervention. These findings underscore the need for multi-level strategies: families should prioritize fostering cultural capital, schools should ensure facility accessibility beyond regular hours, and policymakers must address environmental constraints in urban settings. To facilitate the translation of these insights into practice, a web-based tool has been deployed to help physical education teachers identify at-risk students and design targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.