ArticleBMC cancer2026
Deep learning framework for predicting EGFR mutation status from H&E whole slide images in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are pivotal molecular drivers in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with significant therapeutic implications, yet conventional molecular testing remains costly, time-consuming, and limited by tissue availability. This study aimed to develop and validate a pathology-based predictive model that integrates deep learning and machine learning to identify EGFR mutation status directly from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images (WSIs).
methodsA total of 268 pathologically confirmed LUAD cases were retrospectively included and randomly divided into training and testing cohorts at a 7:3 ratio. WSIs were partitioned into tiles, stain-normalized, and were subsequently encoded using multiple deep learning backbones, including DenseNet201, ResNet50, MobileNetV3, VGG, and Vision Transformer. Patch-level features were aggregated into slide-level representations via an attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) framework. After feature selection with Lasso regression, different machine learning classifiers were constructed. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsIn the independent testing set, the MIL-DenseNet201 combined with logistic regression achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.885, 95% CI: 0.797–0.952; accuracy 82.7%; sensitivity 75.8%; specificity 87.5%), outperforming mean pooling and other backbone-based models. Calibration curves showed strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, while DCA demonstrated greater net clinical benefit compared with benchmark models. Moreover, attention heatmaps provided a qualitative visualization of regions contributing to EGFR mutation prediction.
conclusionAn attention-based MIL framework applied to routine H&E-stained WSIs demonstrated robust performance in predicting EGFR mutation status in LUAD, suggesting its potential as a scalable adjunct to molecular testing. Further validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is warranted to confirm its clinical utility and facilitate translation into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.