ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Multimodal model integrating ultrasound and demographic data for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUltrasonography (US) is useful for soft tissue delineation, but its diagnostic objectivity is limited by surgeon dependency and lack of guidelines. Diagnostic support based on deep learning may overcome these issues, and integrating demographic factors (age, sex, and body mass index [BMI]) may improve accuracy. However, multimodal convolutional neural network (CNN) models incorporating these factors have not been fully investigated for knee osteoarthritis (OA). In this study, we developed such a model and evaluated its usefulness for diagnosis and severity classification.
methodsWe developed image-only and multimodal CNN models using 11 architectures pre-trained on ImageNet. OA severity was classified based on Kellgren–Lawrence grades. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score.
resultsAmong 491 limbs, 318 were diagnosed with OA. For diagnosing knee OA, a statistically significant improvement in performance of the multimodal model compared with the image-only model was observed only for AlexNet (AUC: 0.87 to 0.89, p = 0.036). No significant differences were observed between the models for other architectures, with differences in sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score remaining within 1–3%. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis indicated that the contributions of age, sex, and BMI were generally small, and model predictions were predominantly driven by imaging features. In the stepwise evaluation, ResNet50 (image-only model) showed the highest sensitivity and NPV in the initial screening step (Step 1; 80% and 68%, respectively). For supplemental re-evaluation, ResNet152 and GoogLeNet demonstrated high specificity and PPV (96% and 97%, respectively). In severity classification among OA-positive cases (Step 2), VGG16 achieved the highest sensitivity and NPV (94% and 96%), whereas ResNet50 showed relatively high specificity and PPV (89% and 79%) for definitive diagnostic support following severity classification.
conclusionsCNN models using only US images demonstrated high diagnostic performance for knee OA. The addition of background factors provided limited benefit, suggesting that image-only models are sufficient for diagnostic support.
trial registrationThis study was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registration System: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000056245 ; Trial Registration Number: UMIN000049395; Registration date: 2022/11/01.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.