ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Bayesian inference of mixed Gaussian phylogenetic models.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Robust regression rescues poor phylogenetic decisions.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- A Tale of Too Many Trees: A Conundrum for Phylogenetic Regression.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContinuous traits evolution of a group of taxa that are correlated through a phylogenetic tree is commonly modelled using parametric stochastic differential equations to represent deterministic change of traits through time, while incorporating noises that represent different unobservable evolutionary pressures. A heterogeneous Gaussian process that consists of multiple parametric sub-processes is often used when the observed data come from a very diverse set of taxa. In the maximum likelihood setting, challenges arise when exploring the involved likelihood surface and when interpreting the uncertainty around the parameters.
resultsWe extend the methods to tackle inference problems for mixed Gaussian phylogenetic models (MGPMs) by implementing a Bayesian scheme that can take into account biologically relevant priors. The posterior inference method is based on the Population Monte Carlo (PMC) algorithm that is easily parallelized, and uses an efficient algorithm to calculate the likelihood of phylogenetically correlated observations. A model evaluation method that is based on the proximity of the posterior predictive distribution to the observed data is also implemented. Simulation study is done to test the inference and evaluation capability of the method. Finally, we test our method on a real-world dataset.
conclusionWe implement the method in the R package bgphy, available at https://github.com/bayubeta/bgphy . Simulation study demonstrates that the method is capable to infer parameters to evaluate different models, while its implementation on the real-world dataset indicates that a carefully selected model of evolution based on naturally occurring classifications results in a better fit to the observed data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.