ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2026
Transient visual evoked potential abnormalities in ADNP syndrome.
Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundADNP syndrome is a rare genetic disorder associated with global developmental delay/intellectual disability, autism, aberrant behavior, and medical comorbidities. Sensory symptoms represent a core clinical feature, even in those without autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Differences in visual evoked potentials (VEPs), an objective measure of excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic activity, have been reported in other genetic neurodevelopmental disorders and have yet to be examined in ADNP syndrome.
methodsTransient VEPs (tVEP) were collected from 12 children with ADNP syndrome, 46 autistic children without a known genetic cause, and 19 typically developing children. Time- and frequency-domain variables were compared between groups.
resultsSignificant differences were found between the ADNP and TD groups in amplitude (P60-N75, N75-P100), latency (P60, N75), and magnitude-squared coherence (MSC). Significant differences were also found between the ADNP and ASD group in latency (P60, N75) and MSC (Band 2, 14–28 Hz).
conclusionsVEP abnormalities in children with ADNP syndrome compared to an ASD group and controls were identified. Weaker amplitudes in the ADNP group are consistent with prior research in other genetic neurodevelopmental syndromes. Longer latencies and diminished 14–28 Hz band activity, however, are distinct findings and represent an important area of continued study to explore the presence of syndrome-specific VEP profiles. Establishing VEP biomarkers for ADNP syndrome is a critical direction for future clinical trials in the syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.