SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2026
Safety and efficacy of adding voclosporin to standard treatment of lupus nephritis in adult patients: a meta-analysis and time-to-event analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological considerations on the safety and efficacy of adding voclosporin to standard treatment for lupus nephritis: a commentary.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLupus Nephritis (LN) is one of the most common complications of systemic lupus erythematosus. Recent primary studies have stated the superiority of adding voclosporin to standard treatment regimens in reducing proteinuria in LN patients. In this meta-analysis, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining voclosporin in patients with LN.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science on February 25, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of voclosporin with standard treatment versus placebo. The Cochrane ROB 2.0 tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Cumulative hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using R and RevMan software.
results770 patients with LN were included in the three RCTs, with a mean age of 33.01(SD, 9.94) years. Voclosporin significantly achieved a higher reduction of the urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) below 50% of its baseline value [HR: 1.97, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.35, log-rank p < 0.001], and below 0.5 g/g [HR: 1.84, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.37, log-rank p < 0.001] compared to placebo. There were higher complete and partial response rates at 6 months and 12 months in the voclosporin group, respectively. The overall adverse events and treatment-related serious adverse events significantly increased in the voclosporin group, which increases the clinical concerns of using voclosporin in LN patients.
conclusionThis analysis highlights the superior efficacy outcomes of voclosporin in inducing LN remission and reducing proteinuria. However, the risk of adverse effects was higher when voclosporin was used. Larger primary studies are needed to explore its exact safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41922881What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.