ArticleEMBO reports2026
Conserved but mechanistically diverse piRNA defence against endogenous retroviruses in insects.
Article in EMBO reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pre-Cambrian origin ofeLife · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Defence systems against genetic mobile elements are highly adaptable, yet their long-term evolutionary stability remains unclear. To address this, we examined the conservation of Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA)-mediated defence against envelope-carrying gypsy long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons across insects beyond Drosophila. We show that Aedes aegypti (yellow fever mosquito) and Anopheles stephensi (Asian malaria mosquito), as well as Tetragonula carbonaria (stingless bees), Acheta domesticus (house cricket) and Teleogryllus oceanicus (Pacific field cricket), all produce piRNAs targeting gypsy elements in ovarian somatic cells-the same cellular niche where Drosophila mounts piRNA defence against gypsy-indicating a persistent arms race for more than 400 million years of insect evolution. Notably, in Aedes aegypti, ovarian somatic cells express the same piRNA clusters as other somatic tissues, where they are known to target RNA viruses-suggesting a shared origin of anti-viral and anti-retrotransposon defences. Furthermore, we observe lineage-specific differences in ovarian somatic piRNA biogenesis: slicing-independent phasing appears to dominate in dipterans, ping-pong amplification in bees, and slicing-dependent phasing in crickets. Together, these findings indicate that distinct piRNA pathways have independently evolved at different timepoints to silence the same class of retrotransposons in insect evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.