ArticleCurrent medical science2026
Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes After Conservative Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage Following Cesarean Delivery.
Article in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for severe postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) following cesarean delivery (CD).
methodsA total of 9,366 women who underwent CD for two consecutive pregnancies were included. Bakri balloon tamponade was employed in 87 women, and compression sutures were used in 87 women to control PPH during the first CD. The subsequent pregnancy outcomes and operative findings during the second CD were compared among the groups.
resultsThe preterm delivery rate was 3.2% in the control group, 12.6% in the Bakri group, and 11.5% in the compression suture group (P < 0.001). The rates of placenta accreta (1.4% vs. 1.3% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.017), PPH (0.9% vs. 3.9% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001), and pelvic adhesions (5.2% vs. 6.5% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.004) were significantly greater in the compression suture group. After adjustment, conservative treatment increased the rate of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies threefold. A compression suture increased the risk of placenta accreta by four fold and the incidence of pelvic adhesions by more than two fold in subsequent CD.
conclusionsConservative treatment for PPH following CD is associated with an increased risk of subsequent preterm birth. Women receiving compression sutures have an increased risk of placenta accreta and pelvic adhesions in subsequent pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41922672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.