Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922669›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Rehabilitation after diagnosis of hydrocephalus in severe acquired brain injury: the unmet need for evidence-based guidelines.

Giulio Verrienti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giulio VerrientiDepartment of Neuro-Rehabilitation, Casa Di Cura Villa Verde, 73100, Lecce, Italy. gverrienti@villaverde.lecce.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-7195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydrocephalus, defined as an abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the brain’s ventricular system, often leads to neurological, motor, and cognitive impairments. While surgical procedures such as ventriculoperitoneal shunting or endoscopic third ventriculostomy effectively restore CSF dynamics, there are currently no specific clinical guidelines addressing rehabilitation strategies in the context of hydrocephalus.

objectiveTo identify and synthesize existing recommendations regarding post-acute rehabilitation in patients with hydrocephalus, focusing on evidence derived from broader clinical guidelines, and consensus statements.

methodsA structured literature review was conducted across international guideline repositories and databases (PubMed, Google Scholar). Inclusion criteria comprised guidelines and consensus statements addressing rehabilitation or functional recovery in hydrocephalus.

resultsFive relevant documents were included. None specifically targeted rehabilitation in hydrocephalus, but three main themes emerged: (1) Neurological stabilization and early mobilization following prompt CSF management; (2) Physical and occupational rehabilitation, emphasizing individualized, goal-oriented training; and (3) Multidisciplinary care coordination, involving neurosurgeons, neurologists, physiatrists, and therapists.

conclusionsDespite the recognized importance of rehabilitation, standardized, evidence-based protocols are lacking. Future research should define timing, intensity, and cognitive components of therapy to support neuroplasticity-driven, multidisciplinary rehabilitation and improve long-term functional outcomes in hydrocephalus.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesHydrocephalusPractice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineHumansCSF diversionHydrocephalusMultidisciplinary careNeuroplasticityNeurorehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.