Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922667›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Conceptual but not perceptual encoding leads to age differences in priming.

Maryam A Al-Abdulla, Emma V Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maryam A Al-AbdullaDepartment of Social Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Emma V WardDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Middlesex University, London, NW4 4BT, UK. e.ward@mdx.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2076-832X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specific conditions in which age differences in priming emerge remain to be clarified. Three experiments systematically investigated how cognitive processing requirements moderate age differences in priming. Experiment 1 manipulated perceptual/conceptual encoding prior to a continuous identification priming task, and Experiments 2A and 2B manipulated perceptual/conceptual encoding prior to identification (perceptual) and category verification (conceptual) priming tasks. Recognition was also captured to allow comparison of effects on explicit and implicit memory. A further aim was to provide the first direct comparison of online versus laboratory experiments concerned with priming in aging, necessary to understand the feasibility and robustness of online methods, which are increasing in popularity. Experiments 1 (35 young participants, M

Indexed as

AgingConcept FormationPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyRepetition PrimingAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAgingEncodingExplicit memoryImplicit memoryPriming

Identifiers

PMID41922667
PMCPMC13461660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.