ArticleScientific reports2026
An explainable artificial intelligence framework for ischemic heart disease prediction using enhanced squirrel search feature selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision-making depends on the ability to anticipate ischemic heart disease (IHD) accurately and interpretably. Despite their excellent accuracy, machine learning models are not often accepted in medical applications due to their black-box nature. To diagnose IHD, this study suggests an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) architecture that combines explainable models with the Enhanced Squirrel Search Optimization (ESSO) method for feature selection. The proposed Enhanced Squirrel Search Optimization (ESSO) introduces adaptive exploration mechanisms to efficiently identify an optimal subset of clinically relevant features. By integrating ESSO-based feature selection with Random Forest classification and explainable AI techniques (SHAP and LIME), the framework simultaneously improves predictive performance and provides interpretable insights for clinical decision support. We use SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) methodologies to offer clear explanations into the model’s predictions, building on earlier research that showed how effective squirrel search is at selecting the best clinical features. With KNN-based imputation, normalization, categorical encoding, outlier handling, and SMOTE-based class balancing for managing missing data, the UCI heart disease dataset is utilized for both training and validation. Random Forest is used to classify the chosen features, and domain experts assess the derived explanations for clinical relevance. With precise visual and numeric explanations of contributing features including cp., oldpeak, thal, and ca., the suggested model achieves an accuracy of 98.4%. By bridging the gap between interpretability and high-performance machine learning, our research makes the model appropriate for practical use in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.