ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
"I Was Expecting the Worst": Exploring Barriers and Facilitators to Lung Cancer Screening in Black and Hispanic Communities.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Informing the cultural adaptation of a lung cancer screening shared decision-making and navigation intervention for Hispanic adults: a qualitative study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality but remains underutilized, particularly among Black and Hispanic populations. We explored barriers and facilitators to LCS from the perspectives of screening-eligible patients and clinicians.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews in English or Spanish (per participant preference) with 22 Black or Hispanic patients who had completed at least one LCS exam and 22 clinicians (20 primary care, two pulmonologists) from two safety-net hospitals in Massachusetts. Interview guides were informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Patient interviews explored perceptions of LCS, psychological and logistical barriers, and facilitators to LCS engagement. Clinicians were asked about LCS communication, perceived patient barriers, and system-level challenges. Transcripts were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis.
resultsMany patients were unaware that the scan they completed was for LCS or did not recall discussing LCS with a clinician. Patients commonly reacted with fear upon first hearing the term "lung cancer screening," worrying they might have cancer, which was related to smoking-associated stigma. While patients mentioned barriers such as transportation and competing health demands, most felt they could attend appointments if informed. Clinicians, however, often cited logistical barriers and unmet social needs as key obstacles to LCS among Black and Hispanic patients. When probed further, clinicians were uncertain of the impact of smoking-associated stigma and cancer fear on patients' LCS engagement. Both patients and clinicians suggested that patient navigation could support patients through the LCS process.
conclusionsOur findings highlight a disconnect between clinicians' focus on unmet social needs and patients' emphasis on emotional and psychological factors-particularly stigma and fear-as barriers to LCS. Interventions to improve LCS uptake in Black and Hispanic communities must address both logistical and psychological challenges, incorporating patient navigation to promote equitable LCS.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.