Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922591›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The Trust-Aware XAI (TAXAI) framework: a quantitative model for interpretable and reliable clinical AI systems.

Mahua Pal, Himadri Nath Saha, Amlan Chakrabarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahua PalJD Birla, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. sun.rinka08@gmail.com.
Himadri Nath SahaDepartment of Computer Science, SNEC, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.
Amlan ChakrabartiAKCSIT, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) performs a vital role in ensuring transparency, trust, and accountability in clinical decision support systems. However, most existing XAI techniques such as SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, and DeepLIFT provide post-hoc explanations without quantifying trust, ethical alignment, and governance readiness. As a result, interpretability alone does not reliably translate into dependable AI-based clinical decision support systems. This research work presents Trust-Aware Explainable Artificial Intelligence (TAXAI), an innovative framework that operationalizes explainability as a quantifiable and governance-focused concept. TAXAI combines algorithmic transparency to evaluate the fidelity of explanations, interpretability alignment to reflect consistency with expert reasoning, and compliance and reliability to assess fairness, robustness, and reproducibility. These components are unified through a mathematically robust, normalized Trust Index, allowing systematic and comparable trust evaluation across different models and datasets. The framework is demonstrated across representative radiology and pathology benchmarks using machine-learning and deep-learning models coupled with established XAI methods. The proposed framework demonstrates stable Trust Index values (0.85–0.94) across diverse medical tasks in illustrative benchmark settings. The experimental results demonstrate that TAXAI provides stable, reproducible, and mathematically interpretable trust quantification across diverse explainability methods and benchmark datasets.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalTrustAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningReproducibility of ResultsClinical decision supportEthical artificial intelligenceExplainable artificial intelligenceInterpretabilityTAXAITransparencyTrust-aware AI

Identifiers

PMID41922591
PMCPMC13183888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.