ArticleScientific reports2026
The Trust-Aware XAI (TAXAI) framework: a quantitative model for interpretable and reliable clinical AI systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) performs a vital role in ensuring transparency, trust, and accountability in clinical decision support systems. However, most existing XAI techniques such as SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, and DeepLIFT provide post-hoc explanations without quantifying trust, ethical alignment, and governance readiness. As a result, interpretability alone does not reliably translate into dependable AI-based clinical decision support systems. This research work presents Trust-Aware Explainable Artificial Intelligence (TAXAI), an innovative framework that operationalizes explainability as a quantifiable and governance-focused concept. TAXAI combines algorithmic transparency to evaluate the fidelity of explanations, interpretability alignment to reflect consistency with expert reasoning, and compliance and reliability to assess fairness, robustness, and reproducibility. These components are unified through a mathematically robust, normalized Trust Index, allowing systematic and comparable trust evaluation across different models and datasets. The framework is demonstrated across representative radiology and pathology benchmarks using machine-learning and deep-learning models coupled with established XAI methods. The proposed framework demonstrates stable Trust Index values (0.85–0.94) across diverse medical tasks in illustrative benchmark settings. The experimental results demonstrate that TAXAI provides stable, reproducible, and mathematically interpretable trust quantification across diverse explainability methods and benchmark datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.