ArticleScientific reports2026
Smart and efficient waste management through wireless IoT-enabled deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Waste management is also an important concern in the modern world, which is fast urbanizing and industrializing. The conventional waste sorting techniques are ineffective, expensive, and dangerous to health. The current study will address these issues by suggesting a new Waste Sorting System with Deep Learning (enabled with the use of Wireless IoTs). The first aim is to improve the quality and performance of waste classification. The model suggested is a combination of Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and IoTs to enable real-time data processing and sorting automatically. CNN model is a model that is purposefully suited to large, high-dimensional data sets, which capture intricate patterns in waste photographs. The evaluation of the system was conducted based on a comprehensive dataset of six waste types such as cardboard, glass, metal, paper, plastic, and trash. The outcomes show that there is a high accuracy of 56% and specifically high on cardboard classification 0.86 and high recall of paper 0.88. This data has shown that the suggested model is much more effective in terms of the accuracy of classification and efficiency of operating than the conventional ones. Although the model has certain weaknesses in differentiating between similar categories (that should be visually similar), it offers a strong basis on which improvements can be made in the future. The study contributes to the body of research on waste management sustainability because it provides a scalable, efficient, and automated system to sort waste, and thus introduce additional innovation in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.