ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Primary care pharyngotonsillitis complications following absent or deferred antibiotic treatment across the COVID 19 pandemic.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic prescribing for pharyngotonsillitis in primary healthcare significantly influences patient outcomes, particularly concerning the risk of complications. This study examines trends in antibiotic use and the associated risk of complications before, during and after the pandemic.
methodsThis study used large-scale, register-based data linking primary healthcare records with national and regional registers. The study included individuals aged 12 and older from the Stockholm and Västra Götaland regions, representing about 40% of the Swedish population. We identified 295,972 cases of pharyngotonsillitis between 1 January 2018 and 30 December 30, 2023, applying a 180-day washout period to ensure distinct episodes. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for complications within 30 days, comparing patients who received antibiotics to those who did not.
resultsAntibiotic prescriptions temporarily decrease during the pandemic, followed by a partial rebound, with penicillin remaining the preferred antibiotic. Complications, with peritonsillar abscess being the most common, were more frequent in patients receiving antibiotics (1.75%) compared to untreated individuals (0.43%). Among treated patients, those prescribed penicillin had fewer complications (1.62%) than those given other antibiotics (2.87%). After adjusting for sociodemographics, comorbidities, primary care visits, and vaccination status, the risk for complications is lower for untreated patients (aOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.22-0.26).
conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic impacted antibiotic prescribing patterns in Swedish primary care, with a substantial reduction in overall antibiotic prescribing during the pandemic. Penicillin's continued use as a first-line therapy appears well-justified, given its lower associated risk of complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.