ArticleScientific reports2026
Absence of the luciferase gene in the genome of the kleptoprotein bioluminescent fish Parapriacanthus ransonneti.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of venus-fused Cypridina luciferase (VCL) and specific nanobody-tethering assay to model kleptoprotein uptake.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The metabolic and physiological functions of the living organisms are primarily governed by enzymes encoded within their own genomes. An exception to this doctrine is the phenomenon of kleptobiology, where individuals sequester and use functional modules from their prey. The fish Parapriacanthus ransonneti possesses a luciferase that catalyzes a light-emitting reaction in its light organs. Intriguingly, the protein sequence of this luciferase is identical to that of the ostracod-derived luciferase. We recently demonstrated that the fish sequesters and retains the luciferase from the luminous prey, leading to the hypothesis that the fish does not have a gene encoding the luciferase. To test this hypothesis, here, we produced a high-quality draft genome of P. ransonneti. The assembled size of 625 Mbp closely matches the experimentally estimated genome size of 613 Mbp, and we constructed a gene model with a high BUSCO score. Our search within this gene model did not detect any ostracod-type luciferase genes. Expanding our search to include the entire assembled genome, raw reads, and the transcriptome also supported the absence of the luciferase genes. These results suggest that P. ransonneti lacks the luciferase gene, supporting our previous discovery that it utilizes stolen proteins for bioluminescence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.