ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based temperature prediction across diverse ecosystems for the Boro Season in Bangladesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate variability is vital for effective climate adaptation and risk management. This study investigates the temperature variations during the Boro season in Bangladesh and evaluates the performance of multiple machine learning models for predicting both maximum and minimum temperatures across diverse ecosystems. In this study, we employed several machines learning models and the model performance was evaluated using metrics such as Mean Squared Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE). The results revealed that CatBoost model consistently outperformed other models for Barind and Haor and SVM outperformed for Coastal region, achieving the lowest error metrics across both maximum and minimum temperature predictions. However, The Diebold-Mariano test revealed that linear, DT, and KNN models performed similarly but significantly worse than advanced algorithms, while ensemble methods (RF, GBM, XGBoost, CatBoost) showed no significant differences, indicating robust performance; neural models (CNN, LSTM) yielded mixed results, sometimes aligning with ensembles and sometimes differing significantly. Spatial analysis identified high-risk areas with extreme temperature conditions, particularly in regions like Rajshahi, Natore, and Pabna. These findings emphasize the need for region-specific temperature prediction models and targeted climate adaptation strategies in Bangladesh's diverse ecosystems. The results highlight the importance of localized predictive models and the need for targeted climate adaptation strategies in the face of temperature extremes across Bangladesh's diverse ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.