Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922464›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Physics-guided explainable machine learning for multi-response modeling of electrochemical micro-machining using polymer graphite electrodes.

B Veera Siva Reddy, N Pradeep, Akula Siva Bhaskar, C Chandrasekhara Sastry, Sachin Salunkhe, Robert Cep

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B Veera Siva ReddyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, 518008, India. sivareddy.bobbili@gmail.com.
N PradeepSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600127, India. pradeep.n@vit.ac.in.
Akula Siva BhaskarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, 518008, India.
C Chandrasekhara SastryDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kurnool (IIITDM Kurnool), Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, 518008, India.
Sachin SalunkheDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Robert CepDepartment of Machining, Assembly and Engineering Metrology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, 70800, Czech Republic.

Funding

This work was co-funded by the European Union under the REFRESH - Research Excellence for Region Sustainability and High-tech Industries project (Project No. CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048) via the Operational Programme Just Transition. This article was also supported by the Students Grant Competition SP2024/087, Specific Research of Sustainable Manufacturing Technologies, financed by the Ministry Project No. CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048, SP2024/087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical micro-machining (ECMM) enables high-precision fabrication of micro-features in difficult-to-machine materials; however, its strongly nonlinear, multi-physics nature and the high cost of experimentation severely limit reliable data-driven modeling. This study presents a physics-guided machine learning framework for robust multi-response prediction of ECMM performance using polymer graphite electrodes. Controlled experiments were conducted with non-treated and cryogenically treated electrodes, and four critical responses were evaluated: material removal rate (MRR), overcut (Oc), surface roughness (Ra), and taper angle (Ta). Physics-guided descriptors incorporating interaction-driven and severity-based features were constructed to embed mechanistic structure associated with electrochemical excitation and tool-electrolyte-workpiece coupling. Ensemble learning models were trained and rigorously validated using repeated cross-validation. The optimal physics-guided XGBoost models achieved coefficients of determination of 0.817 (MRR), 0.914 (Oc), 0.866 (Ra), and 0.769 (Ta), with corresponding mean absolute errors of 0.013 g/min, 0.026 mm, 0.261 μm, and 0.049°, respectively, consistently outperforming polynomial and purely data-driven baselines. Ablation analysis confirmed that physics-guided feature integration improved both predictive accuracy and cross-validated stability under limited experimental data conditions. Parity and residual diagnostics demonstrated strong generalization without systematic bias. The results establish physics-guided learning as an effective strategy for bridging electrochemical process physics and data-driven modeling, enabling accurate, robust, and interpretable prediction of ECMM responses. The proposed framework provides a scalable foundation for intelligent micro-manufacturing, with potential applications in adaptive process optimization and digital manufacturing workflows.

Indexed as

Electrochemical micro-machiningExplainable machine learningPhysics-guided modelingPolymer graphite electrodeProcess optimization

Identifiers

PMID41922464
PMCPMC13187055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.