ArticleScientific reports2026
Sociodemographic and clinical determinants of the dementia treatment gap in Singapore and their evolution over a decade.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Singapore, despite significant public health and clinical initiatives, challenges persist in dementia diagnosis. Building on prior evidence of a reduction in the dementia treatment gap, this study examined the sociodemographic and clinical determinants of the treatment gap and how their associations evolved over a decade. This study utilised data from two nationally representative, cross-sectional surveys (Well-being of the Singapore Elderly) conducted in 2013 and 2023. The treatment gap was defined as the proportion of 10/66 dementia cases without a self-reported prior clinical diagnosis. The dementia treatment gap narrowed significantly, decreasing by 19.1% over the decade. However, improvements were largely driven by better diagnosis of moderate to severe dementia (25.3% of treatment gap attributable to Coefficients); in contrast, Coefficients were negative for no/questionable (−10.7%) and mild (−15.1%) dementia, indicating gaps in the diagnosis of early-stage dementia leading to the treatment gap. Over the past decade, Singapore has successfully narrowed its dementia treatment gap, primarily by mitigating socioeconomic barriers and enhancing the detection of moderate-to-severe cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.