ArticleScientific reports2026
Association between maxillary central incisor tooth form and face shape using digital AutoCAD analysis in Pakistani adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial aesthetics depends on the harmony between facial features and dental morphology, specifically the link between face shape and maxillary central incisor form. Classical theories propose that tooth form corresponds to face outline; however, evidence across populations is inconsistent. With the development of digital tools, it is now feasible to analyse associations more precisely. Our study aims to evaluate the tooth form of various maxillary central incisors and their association with facial shape in males and females using AutoCAD software in a sample of the Pakistani population. The cross-sectional study was conducted in the department of Prosthodontics, Islamic International Dental College and Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan. Two standard images of all subjects were captured: one portrait photograph with lips closed and the other of the maxillary anterior teeth with retracted lips, following standardised guidelines. All the images were analysed using AutoCAD 2020 software to create technical illustrations. Dental and facial ratios were obtained and categorised. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Version 27. The chi-square test was used to establish an association between the facial shape, tooth form and gender. Tapering tooth form was most prevalent among the subjects- females: 46(30%), males: 30(20%), followed by ovoid teeth- females: 38(25%), males: 26(17%).The least prevalent form was square-females: 7(4%); males: 6 (4%). In males, tapering faces were the most common- 38(25%), while in females, ovoid faces were the most common 45(29%) and square faces were the least common in both genders. No significant association was observed between face shape and maxillary central incisor form, indicating that the prosthodontic tooth selection should not rely solely on face form criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.