ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-objective optimization consensus model for large-scale group decision-making considering dynamic social networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-objective optimization consensus model for large-scale group decision-making considering dynamic social networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As global climate change intensifies and fossil fuel resources continue to deplete, transitioning to alternative energy sources has become a vital strategy for sustainable development. Photovoltaic (PV) power generation, recognized for its clean, renewable, and low-carbon characteristics, is advancing rapidly. Against this background, site selection for PV power plant stations has become a crucial decision-making factor in ensuring project success. However, in large-scale group decision-making (LGDM), the complex backgrounds and substantial number of decision-makers (DMs) pose a significant challenge in reaching consensus efficiently. Therefore, this paper proposes a multi-objective optimization consensus model (MOOCM) utilizing dynamic trust networks to solve LGDM problems. First, a hybrid trust network (HTN) is built by integrating preference similarity and trust relationships, and DMs are clustered using the Louvain algorithm based on this hybrid network. Second, a MOOCM is designed with the objectives of minimizing costs, maximizing fairness, and achieving a high consensus level. Then, after consensus is reached, the HTN is updated, and secondary clustering is performed to obtain dynamic weights for DMs. Finally, a PV power plant site selection problem with 20 DMs, four alternatives, and four attributes is used as a case study for validation. In the first clustering, the DMs are divided into four subgroups. After consensus is reached, the HTN is updated and a second clustering is performed, which finally produces three subgroups. At the same time, the proposed method can achieve a group consensus level (GCL) of 0.9597, with Cost = 1.7422 and Fairness = 0.9043. These results verify the effectiveness and practical utility of the proposed method in LGDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.