ArticleScientific reports2026
Advancing cardiovascular disease diagnosis with an interpretable and responsible AI framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading global health threat, responsible for one in five deaths worldwide. Early detection is critical to mitigate morbidity and mortality, yet traditional diagnostic methods often rely on reactive clinical assessments, missing opportunities for preventive intervention. In this study, a machine learning (ML) ecosystem is developed to enhance CVD diagnosis through two key approaches: (1) an early warning system using non-clinical, self-reported features for accessible risk stratification, and (2) specialized diagnostic models integrating clinical and non-clinical data. The framework leverages advanced ML techniques, including tabular neural networks (TabNet, TabPFN) and ensemble methods (XGBoost, Random Forest), validated on multi-regional datasets. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis identified ECG-related features as dominant predictors of CVD risk, with ST-segment slope (+0.93) and ST depression (+0.63) exhibiting the strongest effects. Counterfactual explanations from the non-clinical model further revealed actionable preventive measures: reducing exercise-induced angina and chest pain severity, alongside increasing exercise heart rate, could shift predictions from diseased to healthy, highlighting the model's utility for lifestyle interventions. To address ethical and clinical trustworthiness, interpretability tools (SHAP, counterfactuals), fairness mitigation (FairLearn), and uncertainty quantification (Bayesian Neural Networks) are incorporated. Causal inference identified key predictors and their Average Treatment Effects (ATEs) such as exercise-induced angina (ATE: 0.36) and ST slope (ATE: 0.33), informing a hybrid ensemble model that achieved 89% accuracy while reducing dimensionality. The system aligns with FDA Good ML Practices and EU Trustworthy AI guidelines, offering a scalable solution for early detection and equitable diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.