ArticleScientific data2026
Genome-resolved metagenomic survey of 500 samples from 56 hot springs across the Western US.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome-resolved metagenomic survey of 500 samples from 56 hot springs across the Western US.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hot springs are natural laboratories for studying microbial diversity, evolution, and adaptation to extreme environments. Despite their abundance across the Western US, information about the functional and genomic structure of inhabiting microbial communities is restricted to a handful of locations. Here we present a dataset of 500 deep metagenomes, totaling 3.38 terabasepairs and collected from 56 remote hot springs across the US Great Basin and Yellowstone, with 25 of the hot springs surveyed annually over 4 consecutive years. Additionally, we present 780 bacterial and archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) binned from these metagenomes, with completeness ≥80% and contamination ≤5%, of which 149 are considered "high quality". Many of the MAGs likely represent entirely novel genera and even families, relative to the Genome Taxonomy Database. Our spatiotemporally extensive dataset yields insight into the microbial functional structure at dozens of previously unstudied locations, substantially expands our repertoire of extremophile microbial genomes, provides a new resource for high-temperature biotechnology, and enables future phylogenomic studies of these communities through space and time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.