ArticleNature communications2026
Machine-learning enhanced simulations predict graphene is microscopically hydrophobic and not wetting transparent.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interaction between graphene and water is fundamental to applications ranging from filtration to nano-electronics, yet the intrinsic wettability of graphene remains a subject of longstanding debate. In particular, it is disputed whether graphene is wetting transparent-transmitting the wettability of an underlying substrate to the surface. Here, we show using machine-learning enhanced molecular dynamics simulations that pristine graphene is intrinsically hydrophobic and microscopically not wetting transparent. By simulating vibrational sum-frequency generation spectra, we demonstrate that the apparent hydrophilic signatures often observed for monolayer graphene on hydrophilic substrates originate not from wetting transparency, but from signal cancellation caused by water molecules intercalated between the graphene and the substrate. Furthermore, we find that while water intercalation is thermodynamically favorable for monolayers, it becomes unfavorable for multilayer graphene, explaining experimentally observed thickness-dependent wetting behaviors. These findings provide a unified microscopic framework for understanding graphene-water interactions and clarify the crucial role of confined water in two-dimensional material interfaces.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.