Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922223›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2026

Assessment of humoral immune responses elicited by an inactivated lumpy skin disease vaccine in cattle: a preliminary study.

Amarin Rittipornlertrak, Tawatchai Singhla, Pongpisid Koonyosying, Anucha Muenthaisong, Kanokwan Sangkakam, Thanya Varinrak, Nisachon Apinda, Boondarika Nambooppha, Khwanchai Kreausukon, Nattawooti Sthitmatee

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Amarin RittipornlertrakLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Tawatchai SinghlaLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pongpisid KoonyosyingLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Anucha MuenthaisongLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kanokwan SangkakamLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thanya VarinrakLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nisachon ApindaLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Boondarika NamboopphaLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Khwanchai KreausukonLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nattawooti SthitmateeLaboratory of Veterinary Vaccine and Biological Products, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of lumpy skin disease (LSD) is often hampered by adverse effects associated with currently available live attenuated vaccines (LAVs). This preliminary study was therefore designed to determine the immune responses in dairy cattle immunized with either an inactivated LSD vaccine (derived from a local strain) or a commercial LAV. Specifically, five cattle received an inactivated vaccine, and five received a commercial LAV. Humoral immunity was assessed: ELISA titers persisted for over six months in both groups. Furthermore, the virus neutralization test showed no statistical difference in the neutralizing antibody titers between the two groups. These findings confirm that the inactivated vaccine effectively elicited the humoral immune responses and highlight its potential as a promising tool for LSD prevention.

Indexed as

Immunity, HumoralLumpy Skin DiseaseLumpy skin disease virusViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCattleEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleNeutralization TestsVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, InactivatedViral Vaccinesinactivated vaccineindirect ELISAlive attenuated vaccinelumpy skin diseasevirus neutralization test

Identifiers

PMID41922223
PMCPMC13280225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.