Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922198›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2026

Differences in Prokaryotic Community Composition Between Two Climatically Contrasting Years in an Arctic Fjord Ecosystem.

Eva Lopes, Miguel Semedo, Allison Bailey, Philipp Assmy, Catarina Magalhães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eva LopesFaculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6928-5524
Miguel SemedoInterdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-2212
Allison BaileyNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-7080
Philipp AssmyNorwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-7541
Catarina MagalhãesFaculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Matosinhos, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9576-2398

Funding

Centres of Excellence funding scheme 332635Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) 2022.02983.PTDC; COMPETE2030-FEDER-00873300-17183; 2023.14123.PEXScientific Employment Stimulus 2023.08554.CEECIND/CP2848/CT0004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kongsfjorden, a glaciated fjord in the Arctic, is shaped by Atlantic water inflow and seasonal glacier melt. This study compared prokaryotic community dynamics during spring and summer in two contrasting years, 2019 and 2020. In spring 2019, warmer Atlantic water increased temperatures and nutrients, supporting a Phaeocystis pouchetii-dominated bloom. In contrast, spring 2020 was colder, with extensive sea ice and a bloom succession from diatoms to P. pouchetii. Summer surface waters showed strong glacier runoff influence and low-biomass, flagellate-dominated phytoplankton. Greater prokaryotic diversity was observed in 2019, particularly at the surface, which was supported by network analysis revealing fewer interactions among prokaryotes in surface waters during 2020 compared to 2019. Prokaryotic community composition clearly differed between the 2 years, showing vertically homogeneous communities and higher cyanobacterial abundance in 2019, while in 2020 communities were more vertically heterogeneous and potentially locally adapted. These patterns reflect greater Atlantic water influence in 2019 versus more stratified Arctic conditions in 2020. Surface and bottom communities showed contrasting trends, shaped by depth-specific environmental conditions. Our findings highlight the sensitivity of Arctic microbial communities to shifts in hydrography and bloom dynamics and provide important perspectives on the ecological stability and dynamics of Arctic microbial communities under changing environmental conditions.

Indexed as

BacteriaEcosystemEstuariesMicrobiotaArctic RegionsBiodiversityCyanobacteriaIce CoverPhytoplanktonSeasonsSeawaterArcticKongsfjordenphytoplankton bloomprokaryotesseasonality

Identifiers

PMID41922198
PMCPMC13045347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.