ArticleeNeuro2026
Inducible CreER
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update ofInducible CreER2025
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bipolar cells relay visual signals from photoreceptors to ganglion cells. In the mouse retina, 15 bipolar cell subtypes have been identified and are classified as ON or OFF bipolar cells based on their responses to light or as rod or cone bipolar cells based on their photoreceptor connectivity. Despite this diversity, the distinct structural and functional roles of bipolar cell subtypes in visual information processing remain poorly understood, largely due to lack of tools and models for their characterization. In this study, we generated inducible Cre mouse lines driven by the promoters of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.