Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922098›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of sports medicine2026

Stay in Play: a FIFA decision aid for football participation during pregnancy.

Sinead Dufour, Emma Brockwell, Ivi Casagrande, Margie H Davenport

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sinead DufourFaculty of Health Science, School of Rehabilitation, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-1606
Emma BrockwellPrivate Practice, Physiomum, Oxted Surrey, UK.
Ivi CasagrandeIndependent Football Consultant, Brighton, UK.
Margie H DavenportProgram for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada mdavenpo@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5627-5773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGiven the uncertain risk of football participation during pregnancy, this study sought to develop and validate a clinical decision aid to support informed participation.

methodsDevelopment of the decision aid was founded on the knowledge-to-action cycle through the application of the intervention mapping and knowledge transfer scheme. Five steps were followed: (1) scientific literature review; (2) identifying participation barriers and facilitators; (3) developing the objective and approach; (4) identifying the key health screening components and (5) external review by experts working in football (physicians, physiotherapists and coaches), followed by a preliminary usability, content and criterion-validity assessment.

resultsWe recommend discontinuing full-contact football beyond 12 weeks of pregnancy. Players may continue modified training, including low-intensity contact, in the absence of medical contraindications. Consultation and testing of the decision aid took place with 34 end users, including players, coaches and medical staff. These perspectives spanned 12 countries, confirming the high utility for players and their multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) at all levels. Strong support was determined across all aspects of the aid; overall (94% approval), a five-stage approach (97% approval) and the

conclusionThe

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesSoccerDecision MakingFemaleHumansPregnancyFootballPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41922098
PMCPMC13151463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.