ReviewRMD open2026
EULAR-OMERACT consensus-based scoring system for synovitis 10 years later: a validated tool for routine care and clinical trials.
Review in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the presence and degree of synovitis is the cornerstone of managing patients with arthritis. Ultrasound has been shown to be a valuable tool for this in routine care, and several scoring systems have been developed over time. Although there is an overall good validity across several different semi-quantitative scoring systems, they lack reliability when applied in the same patient cohort, emphasising the need for a consensus-based scoring system. A European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) collaboration developed, almost 10 years ago, the consensus-based EULAR-OMERACT scoring system, which has subsequently been validated. It has face and content validity as it makes sense and allows to visualise all components constituting the synovitis complex. It has discriminant validity as it is sensitive to change during treatment, can discriminate between active treatment and placebo in clinical trials and has a moderate-to-excellent inter-observer and intra-observer reliability. It has construct validity by showing a parallel improvement in ultrasound sum scores and Disease Activity Score 28 and joint assessment, respectively. It has criterion validity with a predictive validity for biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) discontinuation and for flares while tapering bDMARDs. In addition, a correlation between the scoring system and histological inflammation was established. Finally, the EULAR-OMERACT scoring system is feasible, as a 24-joint assessment can be performed in 20 min. In conclusion, the EULAR-OMERACT scoring system is a valid scoring system that also fulfils the OMERACT 2.1 filter for instrument selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.