Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922061›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Effectiveness of

Harsh Rastogi, Debarati Sarkar, Latika Rohilla, Sonam Kumar, Anupama Goyal, Gursimran Singh Rana, Rohit Singh, Anju Goyal, Sushma Kumari Saini, Vishali Gupta and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Harsh RastogiOphthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1568-4321
Debarati SarkarInterdisciplinary Research Platform (IDRP), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6175-5962
Latika RohillaNational Institute of Nursing Education, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Sonam KumarOphthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7257-9644
Anupama GoyalPanjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Gursimran Singh RanaOphthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rohit SinghJatan Ujala Seva Sansthan, Shivapuri, India.
Anju GoyalPanjab University, Chandigarh, India.
Sushma Kumari SainiNational Institute of Nursing Education, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Vishali GuptaOphthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Surinder PandavOphthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Mona DuggalNational Institute for Research in Digital Health and Data Science, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India monaduggal2@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-2871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSettings with insufficient human resources struggle to provide timely eye care services and information to the population. mHealth (mobile healthcare) is a promising solution; however, evidence on the effectiveness of interactive voice response (IVR) and real-time phone-based education remains scarce, despite their potential to be scalable and cost-effective. This study aims to implement the METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This 3-armed, parallel, randomised controlled trial of 14 months duration will enrol 381 older adults (aged 60 years and above). Participants will be blinded and randomly (computer-generated) assigned to either of the three groups based on the intervention for eye-health education they receive: both IVR and group calls moderated by a healthcare professional, only IVR and usual care. The two intervention arms will receive the information weekly over a 3-month period through the ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the 'Institute Ethics Committee,' PGIMER, Chandigarh, India (PGI/IEC/2022/EIC000282 dated 18 February 2022). The results will be disseminated via presentations and/or publications at the national and international levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2023/02/049383, dated 1 February 2023.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPatient Education as TopicTelemedicineAgedDigital HealthFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRural Populationeye health literacyhealth promotioninterventionmHealtholder adultsRCT

Identifiers

PMID41922061
PMCPMC13052547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.