ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2026
Clinical outcomes of tooth autotransplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival.
Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Autotransplantation is a procedure that involves the extraction and transplantation of a tooth from one site to another within the same individual. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate how clinical outcomes of autotransplanted teeth evolve over time and the principal reasons for extraction. Methods: Studies were identified from five databases. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the survival rates in the short-term (1 to ≤4 years), medium-term (>4 to ≤8 years), and long-term (>8 years) periods. Subgroup analysis was performed for age and root development. Risks of bias, reasons for extraction, and patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated. Results: Of the 3,941 reports initially identified, 46 were included. The estimated short-, medium-, and long-term survival rates were 96.31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.80-97.82), 88.23% (95% CI, 85.59-90.87), and 84.80% (95% CI, 76.70- 92.91), respectively. There were no significant differences in outcomes between age and root development groups. The most common reason for tooth loss was root resorption. High patient satisfaction rates were reported. Conclusions: Autotransplanted teeth exhibit high survival rates in the short- to medium-term. Minimizing root surface damage and excluding pulpal contaminants may promote longevity. The procedure appeared equally successful for teeth at different stages of root development and across various age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.