Observational studyEuropean journal of public health2026
Psychologically informed reminder messages for promoting BRCA1/2 carrier screening: evidence from a large-scale population-based study.
Observational study in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psychologically Informed Reminder Messages (PIRMs) may promote health-behavior change, but their impact on preventive genetic screening is unclear. Due to low adherence to a screening program, Clalit Health Services initiated an intervention to encourage BRCA1/2 carrier screening in July 2022. This observational study assesses the effectiveness of the intervention in encouraging screening and its spillover effect on related healthcare utilization, focusing on Ashkenazi Jewish females aged 25-50 with no relevant cancer history. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of five PIRMs. Four PIRMs utilized different psychological strategies, while the fifth served as a control. The effectiveness of the intervention on screening adherence was assessed using a regression discontinuity analysis. A Cox regression assessed the effectiveness of the four PIRMs compared to the control. Spillover effects on healthcare utilization were evaluated using logistic regressions. The intervention showed a positive correlation with increased adherence to screening (β = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.01-0.72). The "Barrier Remover" PIRM emphasized ease (hazards ratio = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.16), while the "Health Control" PIRM focused on autonomy (hazards ratio = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14), both indicating greater effectiveness than the control. The findings suggest a positive short-term spillover effect of the "Health Control" PIRM on healthcare utilization compared to the control (odds ratio = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04-1.29). PIRMs effectively increased BRCA1/2 carrier screening adherence, demonstrating a scalable, low-cost intervention to improve preventive healthcare uptake. The effect varied by the psychological strategies, highlighting the potential of tailored behavioral interventions to enhance public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.