Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41921968›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026

Prevalences and determinants of newborn feeding practices in the Netherlands: insights from the 2023 national survey.

Ingrid I E Staal, Nicole Manshanden, Anton Schreuder, Marijn J Vermeulen, Chris H P van den Akker, Milena Buurman, Karen van Drongelen, Joost Velzel, Merian B R Bouwmeester-Landweer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ingrid I E StaalDutch Knowledge Centre for Youth Health, NCJ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8279-8340
Nicole ManshandenDepartment Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Anton SchreuderDutch Knowledge Centre for Youth Health, NCJ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marijn J VermeulenDivision of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris H P van den AkkerDepartment of Pediatrics-Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5494-730X
Milena BuurmanNetherlands Nutrition Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Karen van DrongelenNetherlands Nutrition Centre, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Joost VelzelDepartment Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Merian B R Bouwmeester-LandweerDutch Knowledge Centre for Youth Health, NCJ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding is acknowledged as the optimal source of nutrition for newborns. Data from 2018 indicated a downwards trend in breastfeeding in the Netherlands. Our primary aim was to assess the current prevalence of breastfeeding, formula feeding, and combination feeding. Additionally, we explored factors influencing maternal feeding choices. A cross-sectional survey study was conducted from 2 November 2023 to 2 December 2023. Dutch parents of infants were recruited via Youth Health Care services and online channels, who completed a structured questionnaire on feeding practices, sociodemographic factors, and reasoning. A total of 4803 questionnaires were filled in, of which 215 (4.5%) were excluded because the child was older than 1.5 years or no feeding information was provided. Among mothers, 64% (2949/4588) initiated exclusive breastfeeding after birth, declining to 53% (2329/4385) at 1 month, 49% (1586/3260) at 3 months, and 33% (679/2083) at 6 months. The primary reason for initiating breastfeeding was the belief that breastfeeding is healthier for the baby (2053/3207, 64.0%). When breastfeeding was discontinued, the predominant reason was insufficient milk supply or fear thereof (352/1260, 27.9%). Of 756 mothers who stopped earlier than planned 73.1% (553/756) felt disappointed. High maternal education, home delivery, and first skin-to-skin contact duration of at least 1 hour were positively associated with exclusive breastfeeding. Targeted interventions and standardized data collection are needed to improve breastfeeding support and enable consistent monitoring of trends over time.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornMaleNetherlandsPrevalenceSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41921968
PMCPMC13043219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.