ArticleAnnals of vascular surgery2026
Underuse of Preoperative Testing Before Index Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Claudication in the Outpatient Setting.
Article in Annals of vascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGuidelines across vascular surgery, cardiology, and radiology specialties recommend appropriate preoperative testing prior to revascularization for claudication. We aimed to identify patient and physician characteristics associated with the absence of preoperative testing before peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) performed for claudication.
methodsUsing 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims data, we identified all patients undergoing an index PVI for claudication between 01/2017 and 12/2024. We used CPT codes to identify preoperative testing, which included noninvasive physiologic studies (ABI, pulse volume recordings [PVRs]), near infrared thermography, duplex ultrasound, MRA of the abdomen and pelvis with runoff, CTA of the abdomen and pelvis with runoff, MRA of the lower extremity, or CTA of the lower extremity. Lack of preoperative testing was defined as no preoperative test within 3 months prior to index PVI. We evaluated the associations of patient and physician characteristics with the lack of preoperative testing using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression. We performed sensitivity analyses defining lack of preoperative testing as no testing within 6 and 12 months prior to index PVI.
resultsOf 167,406 patients undergoing index PVI for claudication by 3,771 physicians, 27.4% received no preoperative testing. The odds of receiving no preoperative testing significantly increased over time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02 per year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-1.03). Patients without preoperative testing were more likely to be age ≤ 64 years (versus age 65-74, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11), Black (versus White, aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15), or Hispanic (versus White, aOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.31), and to receive an iliac intervention (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.36). Patients treated by physicians of cardiology (aOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.87-2.10), radiology (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.33), and other nonvascular surgery specialties (aOR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.13-1.42) had higher odds of not receiving preoperative testing compared to patients treated by vascular surgeons. Sensitivity analyses using 6 and 12 months as the time cutoff for testing prior to PVI did not substantially change the results.
conclusionCompliance with society guidelines for preoperative testing prior to outpatient PVI for claudication varies substantially by patient and physician characteristics. Cross-specialty adherence will help ensure patients with claudication receive consistent, evidence-based, high-value care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.