ArticleCancer letters2026
Modeling acquired TKI resistance and effective combination therapeutic strategies in murine RET+ lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cancer letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oncogenic RET gene rearrangements drive a subset of lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selpercatinib and pralsetinib are approved therapeutics. However, acquired resistance remains a hurdle to durable management. Two RET+ lung cancer cell lines (TR.1, TR.2) were established from a Trim24-Ret mouse model and lung tumors resulting from their orthotopic transplantation initially responded to selpercatinib followed by prompt progression within ∼3 weeks of initiating TKI treatment. Cell lines derived from the selpercatinib-resistant TR.1 and TR.2 tumors exhibited in vitro sensitivity to MET and ERBB-targeted TKIs, indicating acquired bypass signaling through these receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The TKI-resistant cell lines showed no evidence for MET gene amplification, but exhibited transcriptional induction of genes that function within MET and ERBB2:ERBB4 interaction networks including ligands (HGF, NRG1), adaptors (GAB1) and co-receptors (NRP1). Exogenous HGF, but not NRG1 reversed in vitro growth inhibition by selpercatinib in TR.1 and TR.2 cells. Mice bearing orthotopic TR.1 or TR.2 lung tumors progressing on selpercatinib underwent significant re-shrinkage upon co-treatment with the MET inhibitor, crizotinib, although similar to the clinical experience, progression again occurred. By contrast, upfront treatment with selpercatinib and crizotinib in orthotopic tumors yielded complete elimination of 7 of 9 TR.1 tumors and both deepened and prolonged the duration of response in TR.2 tumors. The findings provide new insight into mechanisms of acquired resistance through bypass signaling and highlight the therapeutic benefit of simultaneous upfront blockade of driver oncogenes and dominant resistance mechanisms in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.