ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2026
Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Intracranial Meningioma : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors, but the role of traumatic brain injury (TBI) as a risk factor remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize the available observational evidence on the association between TBI and subsequent meningioma risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched through December 5, 2025. Studies comparing meningioma incidence in individuals with and without a history of TBI were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects models. Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses were performed. In results, 10 observational studies (seven case-control and three cohort studies) were included in the systematic review, with eight contributing to the quantitative synthesis. The pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant association between TBI and meningioma (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.95; p=0.0012) with moderate heterogeneity (I2=65.6%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings, although funnel plot asymmetry suggested potential publication bias. We concluded that although a statistical association between prior TBI and meningioma diagnosis was observed, the current evidence does not support a clear causal relationship. The pooled effect appears to be driven mainly by retrospective case-control studies, which are particularly vulnerable to recall and detection bias, whereas cohort studies provide less consistent support for a direct etiological link. Further largescale prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to clarify this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.