Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41921500›Full record

ArticleNutrition reviews2026

The Relationship between Health Literacy, Nutrition Literacy, and Food Literacy and Dietary Behaviors in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Beatriz A Carmona, Valeria Gomez, Shariwa A Oke, Ligia I Reyes, Laura L Bellows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Beatriz A CarmonaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1023-0101
Valeria GomezDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States.
Shariwa A OkeDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States.
Ligia I ReyesDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States.
Laura L BellowsDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5317-5037

Funding

NUTRITION TRAININGT32DK007158 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PATRICIA A CASSANO, Julia L. Finkelstein · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
TRAINING IN MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITIONT32HD087137 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Bellows, Julia L. Finkelstein · 2016 to 2026
$2.0M
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development NICHD 2T32HD087137-06NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD087137NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextNutrition interventions aiming to improve dietary behaviors often incorporate Health Literacy (HL), Nutrition Literacy (NL), or Food Literacy (FL), as a key component. The relationship between Health, Nutrition, and Food Literacy (HNFL) and dietary intake and diet adherence (eg, to dietary patterns or to recommended intake frequency guidelines) is unclear, and the role of the various literacy assessments remains unexamined. These gaps limit the understanding of how HNFL impacts efforts to improve dietary behaviors.

objectiveThis review aimed to examine how HNFL is associated with dietary intake and adherence to dietary patterns or guidelines, emphasizing the type and comprehensiveness of the HNFL assessments used. DATA SOURCES: Five electronic databases were used: PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Psycinfo, and Communication and Mass Media Complete. DATA EXTRACTION: Data screening, extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by 4 reviewers using the PRISMA guidelines and a scale for study quality assessment. DATA ANALYSIS: A total of 49 studies were retrieved from the 2495 originally screened; 26 assessed dietary intake and 23 assessed adherence to particular dietary recommendations. The type of HNFL assessed varied; 27 studies assessed HL, 17 assessed NL, and 5 assessed FL. Seventy-two investigations of the relationship between HNFL and dietary intake and adherence were reported: 42 identified a positive relationship (ie, higher HNFL related to better dietary intake/adherence), 28 did not show a significant relationship, and 2 identified a negative relationship (ie, higher HNFL related to poorer dietary intake/adherence). Studies involving HL showed the most positive relationships to dietary behavior, especially when using more comprehensive tools. Many studies received low quality assessment scores due to psychometric weaknesses in their HNFL tools.

conclusionAlthough the relationship between HNFL and dietary behavior and adherence remains unconfirmed, patterns in the findings suggest that increased HL, especially if assessed with robust tools, is more likely to demonstrate positive associations with positive changes in dietary behavior. Future nutrition intervention studies should carefully select HNFL tools that are robust and appropriate for their research question. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration No. CRD42024556816.

Indexed as

behaviorfruits and vegetablesnutrients

Identifiers

PMID41921500
PMCPMC13340189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.