ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026
Modeling differences in neurodevelopmental maturity of the reading network using support vector regression on functional connectivity data.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting chronological age from functional properties of the brain may be informative of children's neurodevelopmental trajectories. Specifically, neurodevelopmental or learning disorders may be associated with atypical maturation of brain networks. In this study, we examine the relationship between reading disorder (RD) and maturation of functional connectivity (FC) in the brain using a cross-sectional sample of N = 742 participants aged 6-21 years. A support vector regression model was trained to predict chronological age from FC data derived from a whole-brain model as well as multiple 'reduced' models, which were trained on FC data generated from a successively smaller number of regions in the brain's reading network. We hypothesized that the trained models would show systematic underestimation of brain network maturity for poor readers, particularly for the models trained with reading/language regions. Results showed that the most highly weighted regions/functional connections were derived from the default mode and frontoparietal control networks, in line with previous research. The trained whole-brain model implied that participants with RD have a larger brain-age gap (difference between real and predicted age) than controls with typical or advanced reading ability; however additional post-hoc testing only confirmed a tendency for relative overestimation of age in advanced readers in the older cohort. Overall, results suggest that while FC networks may be particularly susceptible to, or reflective of, variation/developmental deviation associated with reading ability, there is large individual variability in the examined population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.