Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41921415›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2026

Impact of sex on chemotherapy toxicity and efficacy in biliary tract cancer: Analysis of ABC, BILCAP trials and population data.

Anna D Wagner, Andre Lopes, Pinkie Chambers, Juan W Valle, John Primrose, Chris Twelves, Luke Steventon, Zhe Wang, David Dodwell, John Bridgewater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna D WagnerDepartment of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andre LopesUniversity College London and CRUK Clinical Trials Centre, London, UK.
Pinkie ChambersUCL School of Pharmacy, London UK. Electronic address: p.chambers@ucl.ac.uk.
Juan W ValleUniversity of Manchester / The Christie, Manchester, UK.
John PrimroseUniversity of Southampton, Department of Surgery, UK.
Chris TwelvesUniversity of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Luke SteventonUCL School of Pharmacy, London UK.
Zhe WangNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
David DodwellNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John BridgewaterUCL Cancer Institute, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsIncreasing evidence suggests sexual dimorphism in treatment effects across cancers; however, its impact in biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains unclear. We compared toxicity and efficacy of palliative and adjuvant chemotherapy between male and female patients with BTC.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of individual patient data from four randomized controlled trials in BTC and English population-based data. Study outcomes were adverse events and overall survival (OS), compared by sex.

resultsAmong 994 trial participants (49% male, 51% female) included in time-to-event analyses, 770 were evaluable for adverse events. Population data included 3,953 patients (46% male, 54% female) for OS analysis. Females experienced higher rates of grade 3/4 fatigue (odds ratio [OR] 2.18; 95% CI 1.02-4.67; p = 0.045). Higher rates of grade 3/4 vomiting (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.00-3.91; p = 0.052), nausea (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.80-4.97; p = 0.14), and fatigue in BILCAP (OR 2.31; 95% CI 0.77-6.88; p = 0.13) were observed in females but were not statistically significant. OS was similar between sexes in ABC trials (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94; 95% CI 0.79-1.11; p = 0.45) and in population data (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.79-1.11; p = 0.45). In BILCAP, the HR for adjuvant capecitabine vs. observation was 0.71 in males (95% CI 0.50-1.00; p = 0.048) and 0.91 in females (95% CI 0.63-1.32; p = 0.625). Females with gallbladder cancer demonstrated improved OS compared with males in BILCAP (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24-0.98; p = 0.04).

conclusionSex differences in toxicity were observed, with higher rates of grade 3/4 fatigue in females. Survival outcomes were broadly similar; however, females with gallbladder cancer receiving adjuvant capecitabine showed improved survival compared with males. Although population analyses were limited by sample size, these findings warrant consideration in the design and interpretation of future BTC trials. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This study investigated the impact of biological sex on treatment outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy for biliary tract cancers, which are typically associated with poor outcomes. Analysis of ABC and BILCAP clinical trials found a higher incidence of severe grade adverse events in women receiving cisplatin/gemcitabine and adjuvant capecitabine, relative to males, whilst overall survival was superior in women in the BILCAP trial. These findings are important for clinicians treating patients with biliary tract cancers and should be considered in the design and analysis of future clinical trials in biliary tract cancer, as the role of biological sex may an important determinant of chemotherapy response.

Indexed as

Biliary tract cancerbiological sexSurvivalsystemic anti-cancer therapytoxicitytreatment response

Identifiers

PMID41921415
PMCPMC13081176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.