Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41921210›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Facilitators and Barriers to Over-the-Counter Hearing Aid Use in People With Dementia: Semistructured Interview Study.

Dana P Urbanski, Alexander M Hungs, Peggy B Nelson, Joseph E Gaugler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dana P UrbanskiDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-9860
Alexander M HungsUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Center for Healthy Aging and Innovation, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-0485-5949
Peggy B NelsonDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, College of Liberal Arts, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-1927
Joseph E GauglerDivision of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4797-485X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids were introduced to improve the affordability and accessibility of hearing health care for adults with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss. While these devices have demonstrated effectiveness in cognitively healthy older adults-particularly in the domains of audibility, self-reported hearing ability, and speech recognition in quiet-their use and outcomes in people with dementia remain underexplored. This issue warrants further attention, as people with dementia often experience co-occurring hearing loss and may rely on OTC hearing aids to overcome cost and access barriers to prescription amplification. However, given the cognitive and functional challenges of dementia, it is unclear whether and how OTC hearing aids can support the hearing care needs of these individuals.

objectiveTo explore interest-holder perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of OTC hearing aids for community-dwelling older adults with dementia, identifying key facilitators and barriers that influence their use in this population.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 45 participants across three interest-holder groups (15 per group): (1) community-dwelling older adults with dementia and hearing loss, (2) family caregivers of community-dwelling older adults with dementia and hearing loss, and (3) geriatric direct care professionals. Interviews were conducted and recorded via secure Zoom (Zoom Communications) videoconferencing, then transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants endorsed several facilitators and barriers to OTC hearing aid use in people with dementia. Facilitators included increased accessibility, perceived affordability and value, and enhanced autonomy and control. Barriers included mistrust of OTC hearing aids, difficulty assessing candidacy due to unreliable self- and proxy reports of hearing status, caregiver uncertainty regarding device programming and adjustment, challenges evaluating device effectiveness, and concerns about caregiver burden and burnout from long-term device management.

conclusionsOTC hearing aids offer meaningful advantages for people with dementia and their family caregivers. However, significant barriers must be addressed to ensure their feasibility and acceptability for this population. Future research should further examine and quantify these barriers to inform the development of tailored devices, services, and delivery models that promote successful OTC hearing aid use in people with dementia and their family caregivers.

Indexed as

DementiaHearing AidsHearing LossPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchassistive technologycaregivercaregivingdementiahearing lossolder adultsover-the-counter hearing aids

Identifiers

PMID41921210
PMCPMC13085983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.