SynthesisEcology letters2026
Artificial Light at Night Consistently Impacts Avian Physiology and Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Ecology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Light at Night Consistently Impacts Avian Physiology and Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis.Ecology letters · 2026Pooled it
- Correction to 'Artificial Light at Night Consistently Impacts Avian Physiology and Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis'.Ecology letters · 2026Article
- The ecological importance of natural dark nights for circadian organization, metabolism and reproduction in birds.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Metropolitan coastal night lighting aligns with ecological and plastic divergence in closely relatedPNAS nexus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial light at night (ALAN) is a major anthropogenic pressure across the tree of life. While ALAN drives population declines in insects and reptiles, birds defy simple patterns. Avian responses to ALAN vary in direction and magnitude, yet the fitness consequences of these responses remain unresolved. We conducted a meta-analysis to test whether ALAN alters avian physiology, behaviour and life-histories, analysing 675 effect sizes from 36 studies across 30 species. We found consistent physiological and behavioural shifts under ALAN, while life-history traits were unaffected. ALAN disrupted physiology through reduced sleep, higher metabolic rate and accelerated reproductive maturation. Behaviourally, daily activity was extended, with earlier onset, later offset, and increased nocturnal activity and foraging effort. Subset analyses revealed stronger ALAN effects in migratory species compared to residents and more pronounced in adults and females than in nestlings and males. Activity shifts, accelerated ageing and sleep disruption were amplified with brighter light. Birds appeared to buffer ALAN effects through physiological and behavioural adjustments, minimising impacts on life-histories, a paradox likely explained by phenotypic plasticity or evolutionary adaptation. We identified key ecological vulnerabilities, emphasising the need for targeted conservation strategies in our increasingly illuminated world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.