Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41921111›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2026

The Patient Monitoring Roundtable as Catalyst for Health Care Innovation: Case Study.

Elena Hinz, Jasper Wagnitz, Merve Sarica, Anne Rike Flint, Amin Chaoui, Mona Prendke, Louis Agha-Mir-Salim, Felix Balzer, Akira-Sebastian Poncette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elena HinzInitiative for Innovation and Collaboration in Healthcare (INCH) e.V, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5851-5963
Jasper WagnitzInitiative for Innovation and Collaboration in Healthcare (INCH) e.V, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9263-5718
Merve SaricaInitiative for Innovation and Collaboration in Healthcare (INCH) e.V, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5150-9476
Anne Rike FlintInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany, 49 30450631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-5812
Amin ChaouiInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany, 49 30450631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-4783
Mona PrendkeInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany, 49 30450631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-9691
Louis Agha-Mir-SalimInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany, 49 30450631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-5084
Felix BalzerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany, 49 30450631.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-2056
Akira-Sebastian PoncetteInitiative for Innovation and Collaboration in Healthcare (INCH) e.V, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4627-7016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the field of patient monitoring, there often remains a gap between clinical needs and the monitoring technologies available from industry. To conquer this, the Patient Monitoring Roundtable (PMRT) live event series offers a sustainable and structured platform for innovation through focused small-group discussions, prioritizing deep engagement among stakeholders. By establishing a dynamic, low-barrier forum, the PMRT aims to serve as a thought leadership platform in patient monitoring and digital health, driving continuous improvement and shaping the future of health care technology. Objective: This paper pursues 2 main objectives: first, to describe the concept, implementation, and practical insights of the PMRT as a novel format for transdisciplinary collaboration in digital health; second, to evaluate its perceived impact and reception among participants. Methods: The concept and implementation of the format were described using internal planning documents, event materials, and communication records. To evaluate participant reception and perceived impact, a cross-sectional online survey was conducted between October 2024 and January 2025. The questionnaire was distributed at PMRT events and via digital channels, including the PMRT newsletter and LinkedIn. Results: The PMRT was conducted 29 times between January 2022 and June 2025. It is usually structured in a keynote, followed by interactive small group workshops and a consecutive group discussion, and concluded by a networking session. Examples of topics include alarm management, tele-surveillance and care, user testing of monitoring devices, implementation science, data protection and cybersecurity, artificial intelligence in medicine, and interoperability. Following each event, a structured set of postevent activities ensures continued engagement and knowledge dissemination. A total of 47 responses were included in the survey analysis. The 2 most represented professional backgrounds were industry representatives and physicians. Other participants came from nursing, research, or other fields. Most respondents reported having experience in patient monitoring and digital health, with no notable differences across professional backgrounds or gender. More than half had attended several PMRT events. Formats such as small group discussions and workshops were viewed as highly effective in fostering dialogue. Most participants felt they were part of a professional community, and some reported having established new collaborations. Informal exchanges and interactive workshops were seen as the most valuable aspects of the event. Conclusions: The PMRT presents a novel, structured, low-threshold platform for clinical-centered transdisciplinary dialogue, professional networking, and knowledge exchange in the field of digital health. Participant reception confirms high acceptance and perceived impact, with many reporting strengthened community ties and new collaborations and valuing the interactive workshop format. These findings demonstrate that the PMRT can serve both as an innovative collaboration model and as a platform with tangible benefits for its attendees.

Indexed as

digital healthehealthhealth care innovationmedtechpatient-centered caretransdisciplinary research

Identifiers

PMID41921111
PMCPMC13043008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.