SynthesisThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume2026
No Mid-Term Benefits of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on medical complications, implant failure rates, and health-care-related costs in patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty.
methodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and the UK Clinical Trials Gateway, was conducted and was limited to studies from database inception to March 31, 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials or cohort studies involving adults (≥18 years old) undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) while receiving a GLP-1 RA treatment of any dosage or duration. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions) assessment. Due to substantial heterogeneity in the study designs, a qualitative synthesis approach was employed.
resultsEight retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 22,611 GLP-1 RA users and 77,810 controls. The mean patient age ranged from 56 to 64 years. Hospital readmission rates showed the most consistently favorable results among GLP-1 RA users, with 3 studies reporting significant reductions of 29% to 47% during the 90-day postoperative period. Five studies demonstrated that GLP-1 RA use was associated with significant reductions, ranging from 30% to 44%, in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates, whereas 3 studies found no significant differences. Hospital resource utilization favored GLP-1 RA therapy, with several studies demonstrating shorter hospital stays and lower 90-day costs. Medical complications yielded variable results: some studies reported increased vascular and pulmonary events among GLP-1 RA users, whereas others observed reduced sepsis and hypoglycemic events in those patients.
conclusionsGLP-1 RA therapy was associated with reduced hospital readmissions and decreased hospital costs within 90 days postoperatively, although its benefits for PJI prevention showed mixed results, with some studies demonstrating significant reductions in PJI while others showed no difference. No consistent clinical advantages were observed at the 2-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.