Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920911›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A phenomenological comparison of the effects of blue light, red light and radio waves on the escape speed of Caenorhabditis elegans and the rate of closure of Gerbera jamesonii petals.

Alexander W Kline, Charles S Beattie, Addison K Shenk, Samuel I Spicher, Timothy A Bloss, Laura Tipton, Marquis T Walker, Laura G Vallier, Kristopher L Schmidt, Giovanna Scarel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexander W KlineDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Charles S BeattieDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Addison K ShenkDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Eastern Mennonite University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Samuel I SpicherDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Eastern Mennonite University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Timothy A BlossDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Laura TiptonDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Marquis T WalkerDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Laura G VallierDepartment of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, United States of America.
Kristopher L SchmidtDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Eastern Mennonite University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Giovanna ScarelDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9712-5664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGreat interest surrounds understanding the effects of radio waves on biological organisms, including humans, animals and plants. Several prior studies, however, showed contradictory results. We hypothesized that the problem lay in the lack of a method for evaluating the energy transferred from radio waves, or electromagnetic waves in general, to biological organisms. Therefore, we proposed to measure the transferred energy with the classic electromagnetic wave energy, i.e., the product of the intensity and the inverse of the frequency of the waves.

methodsTo test this hypothesis, we exposed two simple light-sensitive biological organisms, Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and Gerbera jamesonii (G. jamesonii), to radio waves, red light, blue light and white light. We selected frequency and intensity such that each type of electromagnetic wave could transfer a similar amount of energy to the biological organisms. We then observed the kinematic and postural response of C. elegans, and the rate of closure of G. jamesonii's petals to assess whether similar effects would be detected when the energy at different frequencies is similar.

conclusionsIn both C. elegans and G. jamesonii, we found that radio waves trigger effects like those generated by light with similar energy. This outcome provides support to our hypothesis. We therefore infer that electromagnetic wave intensity needs to be considered when estimating possible harm linked to the exposure of biological organisms to radio waves or, in general, electromagnetic waves. Moreover, the successful ability of radio waves in biological organisms to produce effects like those produced by blue light, together with their long penetration depth in tissues, stimulates the investigation of radio waves as a substitute for blue light in a non-invasive version of optogenetics.

Indexed as

AsteraceaeCaenorhabditis elegansEscape ReactionFlowersRadio WavesAnimalsBlue LightLightRed Light

Identifiers

PMID41920911
PMCPMC13043045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.