ArticlePloS one2026
A phenomenological comparison of the effects of blue light, red light and radio waves on the escape speed of Caenorhabditis elegans and the rate of closure of Gerbera jamesonii petals.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGreat interest surrounds understanding the effects of radio waves on biological organisms, including humans, animals and plants. Several prior studies, however, showed contradictory results. We hypothesized that the problem lay in the lack of a method for evaluating the energy transferred from radio waves, or electromagnetic waves in general, to biological organisms. Therefore, we proposed to measure the transferred energy with the classic electromagnetic wave energy, i.e., the product of the intensity and the inverse of the frequency of the waves.
methodsTo test this hypothesis, we exposed two simple light-sensitive biological organisms, Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) and Gerbera jamesonii (G. jamesonii), to radio waves, red light, blue light and white light. We selected frequency and intensity such that each type of electromagnetic wave could transfer a similar amount of energy to the biological organisms. We then observed the kinematic and postural response of C. elegans, and the rate of closure of G. jamesonii's petals to assess whether similar effects would be detected when the energy at different frequencies is similar.
conclusionsIn both C. elegans and G. jamesonii, we found that radio waves trigger effects like those generated by light with similar energy. This outcome provides support to our hypothesis. We therefore infer that electromagnetic wave intensity needs to be considered when estimating possible harm linked to the exposure of biological organisms to radio waves or, in general, electromagnetic waves. Moreover, the successful ability of radio waves in biological organisms to produce effects like those produced by blue light, together with their long penetration depth in tissues, stimulates the investigation of radio waves as a substitute for blue light in a non-invasive version of optogenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.