Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920904›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Carved in stone: Experimental criteria for identifying Paleolithic bas-relief production techniques and sculptors' expertise.

Émilie Brochard, Luc Doyon, Lloyd A Courtenay, Gilles Tosello, Lila Geis, Francesco d'Errico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Émilie BrochardUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR PACEA, CNRS, MCC, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5864-0844
Luc DoyonUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR PACEA, CNRS, MCC, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7163-6186
Lloyd A CourtenayUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR PACEA, CNRS, MCC, Pessac, France.
Gilles ToselloUniversité de Toulouse, UMR TRACES, CNRS, MCC, Toulouse, France.
Lila GeisUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR PACEA, CNRS, MCC, Pessac, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-7099
Francesco d'ErricoUniversité de Bordeaux, UMR PACEA, CNRS, MCC, Pessac, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paleolithic bas-relief is a rare yet technically demanding form of parietal art whose production methods and skill requirements remain poorly understood. Investigating their production is essential because carving methods and required skills reveal the degree of technical investment, cognitive planning, and craftsmanship mobilized by prehistoric artists. This study presents the first integrated experimental, qualitative, and quantitative investigation of their manufacture. Using Coniacian limestone blocks, we replicated 19 carving modalities, covering pecking, scraping, polishing, engraving, and sequential combinations, executed by participants ranging from novices to a professional sculptor. Each surface was documented through high-resolution photography, Reflectance Transformation Imaging, and 3D scanning, then analyzed via standardized descriptive criteria, roughness measurements, and elliptical Fourier analysis of engraving profiles. Results show that some techniques, such as pecking and engraving, leave distinctive traces, while scraping and polishing often produce overlapping surface signatures, especially when techniques are superimposed. Quantitative data confirm a continuum of surface textures rather than discrete categories and reveal how the sequence of actions can partially obscure earlier marks. Expertise strongly influences mark regularity, efficiency, and isotropy, with the expert producing more controlled and less complex surfaces. The combined qualitative-quantitative approach proved essential: numerical parameters objectively discriminate patterns, but visual assessment remains critical for interpreting surface reliefs in archaeological contexts. By establishing experimentally validated diagnostic criteria for techniques and skill levels, this work provides a robust reference framework for identifying carving methods on archaeological bas-reliefs. The findings open new perspectives for reconstructing chaînes opératoires, assessing knowledge transmission, and exploring the role of specialization in Upper Paleolithic hunter-gatherer societies.

Indexed as

SculptureArchaeologyCalcium CarbonateHumansCalcium Carbonate

Identifiers

PMID41920904
PMCPMC13042861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.