Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41920898›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Understanding experiences and perceptions of perinatal mental health screening tools among under-served groups: A qualitative study of women from ethnic minority communities in the United Kingdom.

Ngozika Jane Hemuka, Laura Kudrna, Lina Martino, Jason Copp, Samina Saudagar, Kimberley Maynard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ngozika Jane HemukaResearch Ethics, Governance and Integrity, Research Strategy and Services Division, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-6512
Laura KudrnaDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-7112
Lina MartinoNIHR Health Determinants Research Collaboration (HDRC) Sandwell, Sandwell MBC, Oldbury, United Kingdom.
Jason CoppResearch Sandwell, Public Health Intelligence Team, Public Health Sandwell, Sandwell MBC, Oldbury, United Kingdom.
Samina SaudagarBarnardo's Smethwick Family Hub, Sandwell, United Kingdom.
Kimberley MaynardSandwell Family Hubs, Oldbury, Sandwell Council, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal mental health problems, such as depression and anxiety, are major global public health concerns. Screening for mental health problems in pregnancy supports early detection and treatment, improving outcomes for women and their families. However, mental ill health is not consistently identified in routine maternal practice, particularly among women from ethnic minority communities in high income countries like the United Kingdom. Although research has explored mental health screening tools among majority ethnic populations, there remains a notable lack of evidence regarding the experiences of women from ethnic minority communities. To address this, this study investigated these women's perceptions of perinatal mental health screening tools used by United Kingdom maternity services.

methodsA qualitative study of women's experiences and perceptions of perinatal mental health screening tools. Purposive sampling strategy was employed to recruit women from ethnic minority communities from a local charity to participate in online and face-to-face semi-structured interviews and a focus group discussion. Participants were asked about their understanding of and experience with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Whooley questions. Data were collected on perceptions of what made it easy or hard to be screened using these tools. Analyses were conducted using a framework analysis approach.

resultsFifteen women took part in the study (12 in interviews; 3 in a focus group), representing Asian, Black African, Bangladeshi, Black Caribbean, Pakistani, and Afghan ethnic backgrounds. Four organising themes were identified after coding. These were: Mixed experiences and perceptions of perinatal mental health screening tools; Factors shaping women's perceptions and engagement with perinatal mental health screening tools: barriers and facilitators; Lack of continuity, early support, and clear pathways hinders women's engagement with mental health screening tools; and Recommendations for improvement.

conclusionsThe detection of mental health problems among women from under-represented communities can be improved by considering the identified themes. Key opportunities include being more explicit and culturally sensitive about mental health, explaining the purpose and benefits of screening tools, its process, and potential outcomes and consequences. It is important to allocate sufficient time, ensure privacy during mental health screening appointments, incorporate open-ended questions and avoid ambiguous words in screening tools. The use of mental health screening tools in the perinatal period needs to be delivered in a supportive context in order to address health and health inequalities.

Indexed as

EthnicityMass ScreeningMental HealthMinority GroupsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansPregnancyQualitative ResearchSouth Asian PeopleUnited KingdomYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41920898
PMCPMC13042707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.