ArticlePloS one2026
Violence against women migrant workers in Thailand: A cross-sectional study on experiences, impact, and help seeking.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViolence against women migrant workers is an alarming public health problem. This study aims to investigate the experiences and impact of violence on women migrant workers in Thailand, including their help-seeking patterns, knowledge, future plans for seeking help, ways of help received, and the factors associated with violence.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 494 women migrant workers across seven key provinces in Thailand - Bangkok, Chiang Rai, Chonburi, Samut Prakan, Rayong, Samut Sakhon, and Tak. Data was collected by well-trained enumerators using the validated standardized structured questionnaire. We analysed multiple logistic regressions to investigate the factors associated with experiences of violence and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with a 95% CI were presented.
resultsThe study identified the lifetime prevalence of violence to be 54.45%, 42.47% for intimate partner violence (IPV), and 46.15% for non-intimate partner violence (N-IPV). Women experienced psychological, physical, and occupational impacts from violence. A significant proportion of women sought informal support from friends (59.1%) and family (52.6%), while formal support was most commonly sought from employers (15.3%) and the police (6.6%). Factors associated with IPV and/or N-IPV among women migrant workers included area of residence, duration of stay, monthly income, perceived safety, Thai language proficiency, and job or income loss during the COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionThe findings highlight widespread violence against migrant women workers in Thailand, urging the need for tailored support services. Key strategies include strengthening workplace-based protections, multilingual reporting mechanisms, peer networks, culturally relevant education, and individual- and community-level interventions within labour, health, and social protection systems. Collaborative efforts among policymakers and stakeholders are vital for the prevention of and response to violence and for ensuring the safety of women migrant workers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.