ArticlePloS one2026
A question best addressed in moderation: Religious affiliation and religious/spiritual importance predicting alcohol consumption in Canadians.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the strongest findings in the religion/spirituality and health literature addresses the consumption of alcohol: higher levels of religion/spirituality are associated with a greater degree of abstention from, or reduced consumption of, alcohol. However, much of the existing literature assumes the measurement of religious/spiritual importance is independent of the measurement of religious affiliation. Such an assumption has led to a misestimation of the relationship between religion/spirituality and alcohol consumption. Using data from Cycle 30 of the Canadian General Social Survey (N > 10,000), we investigated whether religious affiliation moderated the relationship between religious/spiritual importance and alcohol consumption. We compared Atheists to 19 other religious groups, with the general expectation that Atheists would report greater alcohol use. In terms of complete alcohol abstention, Protestants who rated religious/spiritual values as very important were more likely to abstain from alcohol completely, while Catholics who rated religious/spiritual values as less important were less likely to abstain from alcohol completely (relative to Atheists). When examining the frequency of alcohol consumption, Atheists were more likely to report higher frequency of alcohol consumption relative to several religious affiliations who also reported higher religious/spiritual importance. Generally, Atheists were statistically similar to religious groups reporting low-to-moderate levels of religious/spiritual importance. The current results suggest that statistical moderation is advantageous in exploring this relationship, and in the literature tying religion/spirituality to alcohol consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.