ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
ntStat: k-mer characterization using occurrence statistics in raw sequencing data.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AIEdit: Alignment-free genome assembly polisher trained on spaced seed match patterns.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
K-mer counts are fundamental in many genomic data analysis tasks, providing valuable information for genome assembly, error correction, and variant detection. State-of-the-art k-mer counting tools employ various techniques, such as parallelism, probabilistic data structures, and disk utilization, to efficiently extract k-mer frequencies from large datasets. The distribution of k-mer counts in raw sequencing reads reveals key genomic characteristics such as genome size, heterozygosity, and basecalling quality. The number of reads containing a k-mer has also shown application in genome assembly and sequence analysis. We present ntStat, a toolkit that employs succinct Bloom filter data structures to track both k-mer count and depth information and use in downstream applications. ntStat models the k-mer count histogram using evolutionary computation, and infers valuable insights about the genome, sequencing data, and individual k-mers, de novo. ntStat consistently ran faster than DSK, BFCounter, hackgap, and Squeakr in all of our tests. Jellyfish performed faster than ntStat for human data with k = 25 but fell behind with k = 64. KMC3 was faster overall but at a high disk usage and memory cost. ntStat also used less memory than other non-disk-based k-mer counters and typically, 99.5-99.9% of the k-mers processed by ntStat are counted correctly. ntStat's histogram analysis module detected heterozygosity percentages and k-mer coverage for long-read datasets simulated from a diploid human genome with less than 1% and 0.5-fold difference to the ground truth. The analysis of simulated long read datasets showed an average error of just 2% in k-mer robustness estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.