ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Impact of social risk factors on TF-CBT engagement and strategies to mitigate the impact: A qualitative analysis.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social risk factors, or adverse conditions in which people are born, grow, live, and age (1), contribute to greater mental health problems (2,3) and lower treatment engagement worldwide (4). The prevalence and impact of social risk factors (SRFs) are particularly pronounced in low-to-middle income countries (LMICs); however, strategies to address SRFs alongside mental health treatments have not been systematically studied. Building on an NIMH-funded project (BASIC; 5), we invited participants ranging from children and guardians who received and lay counselors that delivered an adapted form of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT; 6) in western Kenya to complete qualitative interviews. In these interviews, we examined both the experience of SRFs and how lay counselors address SRFs within TF-CBT. Results from the qualitative analysis reveal that in the face of SRFs, counselors were already addressing SRFs, though typically by using their own personal resources. Participants also identified a variety of strategies that do not require extensive financial support. Overall, the experience of SRFs and strategies to address SRFs reported in this paper may support the engagement in and effectiveness of evidence-based practices in Kenya and globally.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.